1 Comment
american outlaw
The State of New Jersey
vs.
Michael Klemm
…the story continues. i really intended to just go there, say i’m guilty and leave after paying the fine. but the prosecutor destroyed this plan: when talking to her, i explained what happened in the bus (that i didn’t see it, didn’t give alcohol to them, and so on…). the ticket i got says “letting them drink..” as you know, which is just not correct. therefore she asked me “did you let them drink”, and i was honest/stupid and replied of course “no, i didn’t let them drink”.
before i could even react the took this as a “not guilty” and went on with the standard procedure, which is in this case reschedule for an appointment to trial. after that, when i was in front of the judge, he simply asked me if i know me rights (“yes, i do”), and if i claim guilty or not guilty (“not guilty of letting them drink”) … so on August 20th i have again to drive there, this time for a trial … and hopefully for the last time.
this really pisses me off, cause the prosecutor was just such an unfriendly b*tch, and didn’t help at all. i really just want this to be over, it’s not that i worry about the fine or anything else… it just makes me sleep bad.
the above statement is for all the guys asking me “how was it in camden” – i hate to repeat myself.












hm, heißt das jetzt du hast eine richtige gerichtsverhandlung? mit anwalt?
davon abegesehen, dass es sonst nervig is nochmal hinzufahren droht dir aber auch nix (außer der geldstrafe). es könnt also viel schlimmer sein. lass dich davon nicht aus der bahn werfen. die story kannst du dann deinen enkerln erzählen ;)